Only The Sangfroid

Mark is of fair average intelligence, who is neither perverse, nor morbid or suspicious of mind, nor avid for scandal. He does live in an ivory tower.

These are his draft thoughts…

Uncage the colours; unfurl the flag… Conservative commentary on (trans)gender issues

It’s odd that one of the most significant issues of the weekend was what lurked between the legs of a prominent Australian.  And yet here we are, Piers Akerman and Ross Cameron were both sufficiently puzzled by other people’s gender that they dedicated an excessive amount of time to pondering the nature of gender and the science that underpinned their hateful horseshit.

A brief interlude: it struck me that both of these people could write fantastically hateful things about a prominent Australian and the overwhelming reaction from Twitter was to correct the science.   Who cares if the science is right?  This intolerant nonsense shouldn’t have been in the public debate even if the science was piping hot, straight from the mouth of Richard Dawkins himself.  If they’d said ‘Cate McGregor  deserves contempt for being trans, and there are three hydrogen atoms in water’, why would we spend any time debating the nature of water molecules?

But it’s also surprising to see the appeal to science used to justify all kinds of terrible antisocial attitudes.  Speaking of Dawkins, he recently said that race was a biological fact (and therefore his hatred towards Muslims wasn’t racist… making it somehow okay).  Both Piers and Ross argued that gender was somehow magically linked to evolution or chromosomes or something, refusing to answer the question: ‘Is C-3PO a boy robot or a girl robot?’  But this is what happens in our hyper-positivist hell dimension where everything has to be an empirical fact or it’s just mushy soppy political correctness gone mad.  This is what we get for having celebrity scientists.

Back to the main story: why do conservatives care about McGregor’s gender?

There’s the obvious answer: these people get rewarded for stirring up anger.  Mark Latham, who abused McGregor over social media, resigned during the controversy, and then was immediately offered a job on a television show and another column at The Age.  When pressure was put on Fairfax not to engage Latham, The Daily Telegraph offered him a job instead.  This is ludicrous.  There’s no way to win in a system that rewards hateful bullies.

There’s also an answer related to identity.  These columnists are performing a character.  They have to produce content to a deadline and, often, there’s not a lot to write about.  Instead of engaging with the big issues of the day, it’s just easier to fall back on tired prejudice and claim that you’re speaking for some nasty-minded, petty ‘silent majority’.  In this performance, they’re not lazy cowards punching out at people who can’t fight back; they’re the brave straight-talkers who don’t back down in the face of the ‘PC Police’.  Their success is measured in how much they annoy the ‘other side’, rather than in the quality of the conversation they engage.

And that’s the big loss.  There are important conversations to be had in this space.  How do we become more inclusive?  How do we balance competing interests, perspectives, and needs?  What are the limits of reasonable discussion, and what’s the best way to protect people from hatred?  &c., &c., &c.

Conservatives need to be part of that conversation.  To be part of that conversation, they need to be constructive.  Promoting the careers of Akerman, Cameron, and Ross is not cultivating a good public dialogue.  And, as with all who are incapable of engaging constructively, we should consider excluding them from public debate.  At the very least, we should stop giving them prominent soap boxes.

3 responses to “Uncage the colours; unfurl the flag… Conservative commentary on (trans)gender issues”

  1. You are a beacon of hope in an unpleasant world: a hope that old folk like me can treasure.

    Dawkins goes from bad to worse, alas. Can’t Lalla restrain him a bit? I’m thinking of positing my theory on scientist’s brain lesions or early-onset dementia based on his and a few others incontinent ramblings. Poor lad. He did some good science before he went mad some twenty-five years ago.

    Why are your Australian talkbot loonies taking against transgendered folk now? Many years ago you chaps pioneered acceptance of CD/TV/TS rights. ‘Priscilla’ wasn’t set in Berkshire, or Albany, NY. Are these opinionastis (if you’ll forgive the coinage) repenting being decent human beings or something?

    I’ve always considered myself a High Tory of the post-war consensus type: Macmillanite and Keynesian, obviously, but also in favour of family, clan, education, culture and tradition where it did not need to be reformed. Now it may be that eventually, in some Hegelian fashion, all tradition will go, but not unless it is replaced by something better (I cannot emphasise the word ‘better’ enough) and I would think that next to impossible if we are to retain any sense of continuous cultural identity. As ever, I am prepared to be wrong on this, and put right appropriately. As is, I’m seriously considering voting for Corbyn. I disagree with his policies in many ways, but no-one else standing is going to behave even halfway decently. Hell, I will be sending my kids to Major Public Schools (should they get in) and am perfectly happy to inherit (which I have) and pass on to my kids. I’m from a cadet branch of a noble family (well two or three – but talking patrilinially limits it I suppose) and if someone like me is really considering Corbyn rather than the LibDems, because the present Tory party are so appalling, than as the jargon has it, WTF.

    Vale, old thing. And may folk actually listen, read, comprehend, and agree or disagree as maybe.

    • Australia’s conservatives are increasingly taking after their American friends. We now find a lot of conservative politicians going for courses with American think tanks. I think the shift happened somewhere in the 1980s, and we ended up with conservatives who were also keen for libertarian, pro-market reforms. Really weird.

      I hope you’re well!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: