Only The Sangfroid

Mark is of fair average intelligence, who is neither perverse, nor morbid or suspicious of mind, nor avid for scandal. He does live in an ivory tower.

These are his draft thoughts…

Quick post: Why you shouldn’t care about spoilers (and should spoil everything for everybody)

During a brief discussion with a person on Twitter today, it dawned on me that we have a culture which has turned angsting about spoilers into an obsession.  Experiencing the ‘twist’ is now the only reason to imbibe some particular piece of art.

This was particularly the case for people with the Harry Potter series.  Even fans realised that they were poorly written and in desperate need of an edit.  When I discussed this with a friend of mine, she informed me that it was the plot twists that kept her engaged.

To me, that’s extremely sad.  We have devalued novels to the point where there’s little joy reading them; we only seek to ‘find out what happens next’.  I discussed this problem in a podcast: popular culture has franchised novels around this very point.

With the advent of the internet and discussion boards dedicated to particular television shows, the ‘spoilers’ meme has taken on a new life.  The idea is fed by two concepts: first, that information about plot would ruin the enjoyment for somebody else; second, that it is inconsiderate and rude to discuss a show within a particular timeframe.

The very concept of spoilers ruins something important about cultural works: the resultant discussion and exploration of the ideas put forth.  Through imposing a paradigm of behaviour on each other, we no longer discuss openly and freely the ideas explored through television shows and movies.

That is a huge loss.

It also encourages producers and writers to respond to this environment.  They’re no longer held to account for how well they explore and issue or how well they craft a story; the main thing is that the twist was good.

Look at the difference between our storytelling now and our story telling a few centuries ago.  Writers could take myths and folklore and stories already well known to the audience and craft something new and exciting out of them.  Even though you already knew what was going to happen, the stories made you explore ideas in new ways.

By and large, we don’t do that now.  I’ve written before about historical fiction, at which our modern generation sucks mightily.  Instead of using a particular historical setting to explore something about the human condition, we have biopics slightly fictionalised to demonstrate that, as expected, history occurred in the order that we remembered it and that we should give Meryl Streep an Oscar for her impersonation of a famous person.

People who complain about spoilers are feeding into an unhealthy view of literature.  They should be ignored.  By ignoring them and by spoiling their television shows and novel with gleeful obsession, we will encourage publishers and producers to create better stories which don’t rely on cheap twists and turns to thrill us.

8 responses to “Quick post: Why you shouldn’t care about spoilers (and should spoil everything for everybody)”

  1. I consider spoilers a public service. If knowing how it ends “spoils” it for me then it wasn’t worth reading (watching) anyway and the one who dropped the spoiler is to be commended for saving me some hours of precious and irreplacable leisure time.

  2. ‘We have devalued novels to the point where there’s little point reading them; we only seek to find out ‘what happens next’.’ Alright, firstly, if you’re going to generalise the novel-reading community, find out if it’s actually a popular opinion. Two people does not a crowd make. Secondly, if people enjoy the ‘cheap twists and turns’, why should you ignore them? That’s elitist. The fun gained from these plot twists is from trying to work them out. If you think they’re ‘cheap’, well, don’t watch them. If you eschew plot twists in favour of orgasming over rich, beautiful language and mind-blowing musings at the human condition, fine. Just don’t spoil things for other people.

    • ‘That’s elitist.’

      And that’s a bad thing? Shouldn’t we aspire to be elite. People didn’t watch the Olympics to watch the mediocre, after all.

      ‘Just don’t spoil things for other people.’

      I’ve decided to be the change that I want to see in the world.

  3. […] If we use a different set of lenses — the philosophical goggles of jurisprudence and political theory — it’s possible to construct a different interpretation of the fantasy world depicted, and an interesting critique of virtue ethics.  As I don’t think much of the books, I’m limiting discussion to consider only the show.  If you dislike spoilers, you should read this. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: